Could Ukraine usher in the next phase of the Great Reset?
Where some see a major international crisis others see more politics of fear under a geopolitical guise
I will preface this post by stating that I have no way of knowing what is really going on in the Ukraine—I doubt many people do. To be sure, there likely are legitimate geopolitical crosscurrents, such as NATO’s contentious expansion, contributing to this crisis, which brings with each passing day invocations of frightening new scenarios, some of which could very well come to pass. Yet even in the fog of war it is important to examine events from a critical distance, and hear out alternative viewpoints, in order to assess the possibility of larger games being played.
Foreign policy, for example, is often an extension of domestic politics, and there are those who see a “Wag the Dog” dimension to the Ukraine conflict—that is, a manufactured diversion from political and economic instability on the home front.
To give one example of a story that got lost in the Ukraine frenzy: Last week Germany’s largest health insurance company came out with an estimate that Covid-19 vaccines have been responsible for more than 30,000 deaths in that country.
The World Economic Forum (WEF), meanwhile, released a proposal for a digital ID system that would collect and use individuals’ data to determine their access to various services. This could be interpreted as evidence that the Great Reset, which many believe would establish a Chinese-style social credit system in Western societies, continues to advance while our attention is diverted towards the Ukraine. (You can read a critical assessment of the proposal here.)
The World Health Organization also pressed ahead with a binding treaty that would authorize the intergovernmental body to manage future pandemics, a potential step towards the implementation of the one world government believed by many to be the WEF’s true endgame.
This past week, I wrote about the possibility of cyberattacks resulting from the geopolitical conflict, and some observers view the Ukraine crisis as a continuation of the politics of fear that has dominated the past couple of years.
In an opinion piece titled “Order out of Chaos: How the Ukraine Conflict Is Designed to Benefit Globalists,” Brandon Smith argues (as have others) that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a propped-up enemy, a manufactured boogeyman who is in fact a card-carrying member of Team WEF.
Smith writes:
There are some in the alternative media and the liberty movement who falsely believe that Russia is anti-globalist – Nothing could be further from the truth. As with many political leaders Putin will sometimes use anti-globalists rhetoric, but his relationships tell another story. In Putin’s first autobiography, titled ‘First Person’, he discusses with fondness his first encounter with New World Order globalist Henry Kissinger as a member of the FSB (formerly the KGB). As Putin rose through the political ranks he maintained a steady friendship with Kissinger and to this day they have regular lunches and Kissinger has been an adviser to multiple branches of the Kremlin.
It doesn’t stop there, though. Putin and the Kremlin have also kept a steady dialogue with the World Economic Forum, the project of the now notorious globalist Klaus Schwab. In fact, only last year Russia announced it was joining the WEF’s “Fourth Industrial Revolution Network” which focuses on economic socialization, Artificial Intelligence, the “internet of things” and a host of other globalist interests which will all lead to worldwide technocracy and tyranny.
Again, the Russian government is NOT anti-globalist. This claim is nonsense and always has been. I would attribute the fantasy of Russian opposition to a steady stream of propaganda and what I call the False East/West Paradigm – The fraudulent notion that the globalist agenda is a purely Western or American agenda and that countries like China and Russia are opposed to it. If you look at the close interactions between the east and the globalists, this idea completely falls apart.
It’s important to understand that most conflicts between the East and the West are engineered conflicts and the leaders of BOTH SIDES are not really at odds with each other. Rather, these wars are Kabuki Theater; they are wars of convenience to achieve covert ends while mesmerizing the masses with moments of terror and calamity. For anyone who has doubts about this, I highly recommend they read the thoroughly researched and evidenced works of professional historian and economist Antony Sutton, who quite accidentally stumbled onto the facts surrounding the globalist conspiracy and went on to expose their habit of playing both sides of nearly every war over the past century from the Bolshevik Revolution to WWII and onward.
The strategy of order out of chaos is nothing new, it’s something the globalists have been doing for a very long time. The number of open revelations post-Covid about the ‘Great Reset’ that globalists have publicly admitted to is so staggering that their plans can no longer be denied. Any skeptics at this point should be suspected of having a single digit IQ.
So, now that we have established the reality of globalist involvement in both the west and in Russia, we need to ask ourselves how they benefit from initiating a crisis between these powers over Ukraine? What do they get out of it?
As I have noted in recent articles, it appears to me that Ukraine is a Plan B attempt to conjure more smoke and mirrors where the Covid pandemic failed to satisfy the Great Reset plan. As Klaus Schwab and the WEF has constantly asserted, they saw the pandemic as the perfect “opportunity” to force the Fourth Industrial Revolution on the world. As globalist Rahm Emanual once opined in the wake of the 2008 economic crash:
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is it’s an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”
The Russian government, it should be noted, has followed many of the same controversial pandemic protocols prescribed by the the Western elite. Until very recently, it was pushing a national QR code system based on vaccination status, before backing down in the face of public blowback.
For what it’s worth, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has apparently cultivated ties with the WEF as well:
Some analysts have noted that the energy policies adopted by Western governments enabled the Ukraine invasion by providing Russia with economic leverage it otherwise would not have had. At least one analyst has gone so far as to wonder whether the EU has purposefully brought this crisis upon itself:
It all comes down to whether the EU decides to destroy its economy by doing what we Americans call ‘suicide by cop.’ That’s where someone wants to die and picks a fight with a policeman in order to get the cop to shoot him.
Europe is staring at a complete collapse of its economy if they sanction Russia’s energy sector and shut down her ability to do business with their banks. The question no one is asking is, “Did they provoke this fight on purpose to do exactly this?” From where I’m sitting, it looks to me like their insistence on zero diplomatic concessions to Russia led directly to this outcome. So, the answer to my question is ‘Yes, it was deliberate.’
I will leave you with an excerpt from a recent Substack post by Tessa Lena, a Russian musician living in New York:
My gut feeling is that the Ukrainian people are being thrown under the bus by both the Russian and the Western oligarchs. And I am sure that the members of each group of the superrich have their individual sub-goals—but I think that they are mainly after a shared goal on which they agree (a shakeup of oil and food prices leading to global 4IR)—and the people on the ground pay the price, which is just terrible.
As far as theories, all I know is that the Russian higher-ups, just like the Western higher-ups, are super tight with Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum. I find it impossible to believe that “the Russians” are in a real conflict with the West, beyond the usual.
Yes, like any betrayers, the Russian higher-ups probably hope that they can eat more peasants than their competitors—but there is just no way that they are not in agreement with the West on the goal of restructuring the world’s economy and installing the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
So I think that we are looking at a continuation of the deliberate destruction of the economy in order to bring the world to its knees and help Klaus Schwab and his accomplices build back better. In the process, both Putin and his Western colleagues hope to steal the most, at the expense of Ukrainian people, treated as collateral damage.
So I think it’s just a cruel geopolitical scam that is supposed to kill several birds with one stone: boost military profits, help individual oligarchs rob and steal, drive oil and food prices up, distract people from thinking about how badly we’ve been scammed with “health response” by all of our leaders—and ultimately, “build back better” all over the world.